# Justification of research using systematic reviews continues to be inconsistent in clinical health science—A systematic review and meta-analysis of meta-research studies

**Type:** Papers  
**Canonical URL:** https://scholariq.org/papers/justification-of-research-using-systematic-reviews-continues-to-be-inconsistent/

## Facts

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Author Names | Jane Andreasen,Birgitte Nørgaard,Eva Draborg,Carsten Bogh Juhl,Jennifer Yost,Klara Brunnhuber,Karen A. Robinson,Hans Lund |
| Citations | 21 |
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0276955 |
| Fields | Decision Sciences,Health Professions,Medicine |
| Open Access | true |
| OA Status | gold |
| OA URL | https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276955 |
| OpenAlex ID | https://openalex.org/W4307715248 |
| PMID | 36315526 |
| Type | review |
| Year | 2022 |

## Paper authors

- [Jane Andreasen](https://scholariq.org/researchers/jane-andreasen/)
- [Karen A. Robinson](https://scholariq.org/researchers/karen-a-robinson/)
- [Carsten Bogh Juhl](https://scholariq.org/researchers/carsten-bogh-juhl/)
- [Jennifer Yost](https://scholariq.org/researchers/jennifer-yost/)
- [Hans Lund](https://scholariq.org/researchers/hans-lund/)

## Paper journal

- [PLoS ONE](https://scholariq.org/journals/plos-one/)

## Paper primary topic

- [Meta-analysis and systematic reviews](https://scholariq.org/topics/meta-analysis-and-systematic-reviews/)

## Paper topics

- [Meta-analysis and systematic reviews](https://scholariq.org/topics/meta-analysis-and-systematic-reviews/)
- [Health Sciences Research and Education](https://scholariq.org/topics/health-sciences-research-and-education/)
- [Ethics in Clinical Research](https://scholariq.org/topics/ethics-in-clinical-research/)

---
Source: ScholarIQ — public research metadata, principally OpenAlex. See https://scholariq.org/sources/ for provenance and https://scholariq.org/methodology/ for what these figures mean.