# Andrew D Oxman

**Type:** Researchers  
**Canonical URL:** https://scholariq.org/researchers/andrew-d-oxman/

## Facts

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Citations | 166,153 |
| Field | Health Policy Implementation Science |
| h-index | 112 |
| i10-index | 294 |
| Last Known Institution | Norwegian Institute of Public Health |
| OpenAlex ID | https://openalex.org/A5082652200 |
| ORCID iD | 0000-0002-5608-5061 |
| Works | 450 |

## Researcher papers

Showing 12 of 19.

- [The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials](https://scholariq.org/papers/the-cochrane-collaboration-s-tool-for-assessing-risk-of-bias-in-randomised/)
- [GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations](https://scholariq.org/papers/grade-an-emerging-consensus-on-rating-quality-of-evidence-and-strength-of/)
- [GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables](https://scholariq.org/papers/grade-guidelines-1-introduction-grade-evidence-profiles-and-summary-of-findings/)
- [Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations](https://scholariq.org/papers/grading-quality-of-evidence-and-strength-of-recommendations/)
- [GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence](https://scholariq.org/papers/grade-guidelines-3-rating-the-quality-of-evidence/)
- [Audit and feedback: effects on professional practice and healthcare outcomes](https://scholariq.org/papers/audit-and-feedback-effects-on-professional-practice-and-healthcare-outcomes/)
- [What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians?](https://scholariq.org/papers/what-is-quality-of-evidence-and-why-is-it-important-to-clinicians/)
- [GRADE guidelines: A new series of articles in the Journal of Clinical Epidemiology](https://scholariq.org/papers/grade-guidelines-a-new-series-of-articles-in-the-journal-of-clinical/)
- [GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)](https://scholariq.org/papers/grade-guidelines-4-rating-the-quality-of-evidence-study-limitations-risk-of-bias/)
- [GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision](https://scholariq.org/papers/grade-guidelines-6-rating-the-quality-of-evidence-imprecision/)
- [GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency](https://scholariq.org/papers/grade-guidelines-7-rating-the-quality-of-evidence-inconsistency/)
- [GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness](https://scholariq.org/papers/grade-guidelines-8-rating-the-quality-of-evidence-indirectness/)

## Researcher topics

- [Health Policy Implementation Science](https://scholariq.org/topics/health-policy-implementation-science/)
- [Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life](https://scholariq.org/topics/health-systems-economic-evaluations-quality-of-life/)
- [Meta-analysis and systematic reviews](https://scholariq.org/topics/meta-analysis-and-systematic-reviews/)
- [Clinical practice guidelines implementation](https://scholariq.org/topics/clinical-practice-guidelines-implementation/)
- [Primary Care and Health Outcomes](https://scholariq.org/topics/primary-care-and-health-outcomes/)

## Researcher university

- [Norwegian Institute of Public Health](https://scholariq.org/institutions/norwegian-institute-of-public-health/)

---
Source: ScholarIQ — public research metadata, principally OpenAlex. See https://scholariq.org/sources/ for provenance and https://scholariq.org/methodology/ for what these figures mean.