# Gunn Elisabeth Vist

**Type:** Researchers  
**Canonical URL:** https://scholariq.org/researchers/gunn-elisabeth-vist/

## Facts

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Citations | 88,250 |
| Field | Meta-analysis and systematic reviews |
| h-index | 59 |
| i10-index | 91 |
| Last Known Institution | Norwegian Institute of Public Health |
| OpenAlex ID | https://openalex.org/A5008584776 |
| ORCID iD | https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7764-2501 |
| Works | 234 |

## Researcher papers

- [GRADE: an emerging consensus on rating quality of evidence and strength of recommendations](https://scholariq.org/papers/grade-an-emerging-consensus-on-rating-quality-of-evidence-and-strength-of/)
- [GRADE guidelines: 1. Introduction—GRADE evidence profiles and summary of findings tables](https://scholariq.org/papers/grade-guidelines-1-introduction-grade-evidence-profiles-and-summary-of-findings/)
- [Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations](https://scholariq.org/papers/grading-quality-of-evidence-and-strength-of-recommendations/)
- [GRADE guidelines: 3. Rating the quality of evidence](https://scholariq.org/papers/grade-guidelines-3-rating-the-quality-of-evidence/)
- [What is “quality of evidence” and why is it important to clinicians?](https://scholariq.org/papers/what-is-quality-of-evidence-and-why-is-it-important-to-clinicians/)
- [GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence—study limitations (risk of bias)](https://scholariq.org/papers/grade-guidelines-4-rating-the-quality-of-evidence-study-limitations-risk-of-bias/)
- [GRADE guidelines 6. Rating the quality of evidence—imprecision](https://scholariq.org/papers/grade-guidelines-6-rating-the-quality-of-evidence-imprecision/)
- [GRADE guidelines: 7. Rating the quality of evidence—inconsistency](https://scholariq.org/papers/grade-guidelines-7-rating-the-quality-of-evidence-inconsistency/)
- [GRADE guidelines: 8. Rating the quality of evidence—indirectness](https://scholariq.org/papers/grade-guidelines-8-rating-the-quality-of-evidence-indirectness/)
- [Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations for diagnostic tests and strategies](https://scholariq.org/papers/grading-quality-of-evidence-and-strength-of-recommendations-for-diagnostic-tests/)
- [The GRADE approach is reproducible in assessing the quality of evidence of quantitative evidence syntheses](https://scholariq.org/papers/the-grade-approach-is-reproducible-in-assessing-the-quality-of-evidence-of/)
- [Systems for grading the quality of evidence and the strength of recommendations II: Pilot study of a new system](https://scholariq.org/papers/systems-for-grading-the-quality-of-evidence-and-the-strength-of-recommendations/)

## Researcher topics

- [Meta-analysis and systematic reviews](https://scholariq.org/topics/meta-analysis-and-systematic-reviews/)
- [Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life](https://scholariq.org/topics/health-systems-economic-evaluations-quality-of-life/)
- [Clinical practice guidelines implementation](https://scholariq.org/topics/clinical-practice-guidelines-implementation/)
- [Health Policy Implementation Science](https://scholariq.org/topics/health-policy-implementation-science/)
- [Education, Healthcare and Sociology Research](https://scholariq.org/topics/education-healthcare-and-sociology-research/)

## Researcher university

- [Norwegian Institute of Public Health](https://scholariq.org/institutions/norwegian-institute-of-public-health/)

---
Source: ScholarIQ — public research metadata, principally OpenAlex. See https://scholariq.org/sources/ for provenance and https://scholariq.org/methodology/ for what these figures mean.