# Evaluation and Performance Assessment **Type:** Topics **Canonical URL:** https://scholariq.org/topics/evaluation-and-performance-assessment/ ## Facts | Field | Value | | --- | --- | | Description | This cluster of papers focuses on theory-based evaluation methods, such as concept mapping and realist synthesis, for analyzing complex interventions. It also explores evaluation capacity building, logic models, empowerment evaluation, and the role of evidence-based policy in shaping evaluation practices. | | Domain | Social Sciences | | Field | Decision Sciences | | OpenAlex ID | t12010 | | Works | 39 | ## Topic papers all Showing 15 of 39. - [A conceptual framework for implementation fidelity](https://scholariq.org/papers/a-conceptual-framework-for-implementation-fidelity/) - [Guidance on how to develop complex interventions to improve health and healthcare](https://scholariq.org/papers/guidance-on-how-to-develop-complex-interventions-to-improve-health-and/) - [Making sense of complexity in context and implementation: the Context and Implementation of Complex Interventions (CICI) framework](https://scholariq.org/papers/making-sense-of-complexity-in-context-and-implementation-the-context-and/) - [Using Qualitative Evidence in Decision Making for Health and Social Interventions: An Approach to Assess Confidence in Findings from Qualitative Evidence Syntheses (GRADE-CERQual)](https://scholariq.org/papers/using-qualitative-evidence-in-decision-making-for-health-and-social/) - [Realist randomised controlled trials: A new approach to evaluating complex public health interventions](https://scholariq.org/papers/realist-randomised-controlled-trials-a-new-approach-to-evaluating-complex-public/) - [Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods](https://scholariq.org/papers/synthesising-qualitative-and-quantitative-evidence-a-review-of-possible-methods-2/) - [Framework for the development and evaluation of complex interventions: gap analysis, workshop and consultation-informed update](https://scholariq.org/papers/framework-for-the-development-and-evaluation-of-complex-interventions-gap/) - [Understanding and applying the RE-AIM framework: Clarifications and resources](https://scholariq.org/papers/understanding-and-applying-the-re-aim-framework-clarifications-and-resources/) - [Advancing the Science of Community-Level Interventions](https://scholariq.org/papers/advancing-the-science-of-community-level-interventions/) - [An Introduction to Qualitative Research: Learning in the Field](https://scholariq.org/papers/an-introduction-to-qualitative-research-learning-in-the-field/) - [The Journal of Mixed Methods Research Starts a New Decade: The Mixed Methods Research Integration Trilogy and Its Dimensions](https://scholariq.org/papers/the-i-journal-of-mixed-methods-research-i-starts-a-new-decade-the-mixed-methods/) - [Two Methodological Approaches to the Integration of Mixed Methods and Case Study Designs: A Systematic Review](https://scholariq.org/papers/two-methodological-approaches-to-the-integration-of-mixed-methods-and-case-study/) - [The Mixed Methods Research Workbook: Activities for Designing, Implementing, and Publishing Projects](https://scholariq.org/papers/the-mixed-methods-research-workbook-activities-for-designing-implementing-and/) - [The Qualitative-Quantitative Debate: New Perspectives.](https://scholariq.org/papers/the-qualitative-quantitative-debate-new-perspectives/) - [Describing the impact of health research: a Research Impact Framework](https://scholariq.org/papers/describing-the-impact-of-health-research-a-research-impact-framework/) ## Topic primary papers - [Synthesising qualitative and quantitative evidence: a review of possible methods](https://scholariq.org/papers/synthesising-qualitative-and-quantitative-evidence-a-review-of-possible-methods-2/) - [An Introduction to Qualitative Research: Learning in the Field](https://scholariq.org/papers/an-introduction-to-qualitative-research-learning-in-the-field/) - [The Mixed Methods Research Workbook: Activities for Designing, Implementing, and Publishing Projects](https://scholariq.org/papers/the-mixed-methods-research-workbook-activities-for-designing-implementing-and/) - [The Qualitative-Quantitative Debate: New Perspectives.](https://scholariq.org/papers/the-qualitative-quantitative-debate-new-perspectives/) - [Constructivism: A Naturalistic Methodology for Nursing Inquiry](https://scholariq.org/papers/constructivism-a-naturalistic-methodology-for-nursing-inquiry/) - [The “realist search”: A systematic scoping review of current practice and reporting](https://scholariq.org/papers/the-realist-search-a-systematic-scoping-review-of-current-practice-and-reporting/) - [A Guide to Multisite Qualitative Analysis](https://scholariq.org/papers/a-guide-to-multisite-qualitative-analysis/) - [Healthcare organization–education partnerships and career ladder programs for health care workers](https://scholariq.org/papers/healthcare-organization-education-partnerships-and-career-ladder-programs-for/) - [From best practice to best fit: understanding and navigating wicked problems in international development](https://scholariq.org/papers/from-best-practice-to-best-fit-understanding-and-navigating-wicked-problems-in/) - [Proceedings of the 3rd Biennial Conference of the Society for Implementation Research Collaboration (SIRC) 2015: advancing efficient methodologies through community partnerships and team science](https://scholariq.org/papers/proceedings-of-the-3rd-biennial-conference-of-the-society-for-implementation/) - [Assessment of Study Quality](https://scholariq.org/papers/assessment-of-study-quality/) - [Introduction - Towards Systemic Approaches to Evaluation and Impact](https://scholariq.org/papers/introduction-towards-systemic-approaches-to-evaluation-and-impact/) - [Practice-Based Clinical Inquiry in Nursing for DNP and PhD Research](https://scholariq.org/papers/practice-based-clinical-inquiry-in-nursing-for-dnp-and-phd-research/) - [The art and science of developmental and advocacy evaluation](https://scholariq.org/papers/the-art-and-science-of-developmental-and-advocacy-evaluation/) --- Source: ScholarIQ — public research metadata, principally OpenAlex. See https://scholariq.org/sources/ for provenance and https://scholariq.org/methodology/ for what these figures mean.