# scientometrics and bibliometrics research

**Type:** Topics  
**Canonical URL:** https://scholariq.org/topics/scientometrics-and-bibliometrics-research/

## Facts

| Field | Value |
| --- | --- |
| Description | This cluster of papers focuses on bibliometric analysis, research evaluation, and the assessment of scientific impact. It covers topics such as citation networks, collaboration patterns, open access publishing, social impact assessment, altmetrics, co-authorship networks, and interdisciplinary research. |
| Domain | Social Sciences |
| Field | Decision Sciences |
| OpenAlex ID | t10102 |
| Works | 94 |

## Topic papers all

Showing 15 of 94.

- [A manifesto for reproducible science](https://scholariq.org/papers/a-manifesto-for-reproducible-science/)
- [The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching](https://scholariq.org/papers/the-role-of-google-scholar-in-evidence-reviews-and-its-applicability-to-grey/)
- [Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews](https://scholariq.org/papers/systematic-reviews-identifying-relevant-studies-for-systematic-reviews/)
- [Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources](https://scholariq.org/papers/which-academic-search-systems-are-suitable-for-systematic-reviews-or-meta/)
- [Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study](https://scholariq.org/papers/optimal-database-combinations-for-literature-searches-in-systematic-reviews-a/)
- [Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview](https://scholariq.org/papers/systematic-review-finds-overlapping-reviews-were-not-mentioned-in-every-other/)
- [Predicting the extent of heterogeneity in meta-analysis, using empirical data from the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews](https://scholariq.org/papers/predicting-the-extent-of-heterogeneity-in-meta-analysis-using-empirical-data/)
- [Ten simple rules for conducting umbrella reviews](https://scholariq.org/papers/ten-simple-rules-for-conducting-umbrella-reviews/)
- [A full systematic review was completed in 2 weeks using automation tools: a case study](https://scholariq.org/papers/a-full-systematic-review-was-completed-in-2-weeks-using-automation-tools-a-case/)
- [Google Scholar to overshadow them all? Comparing the sizes of 12 academic search engines and bibliographic databases](https://scholariq.org/papers/google-scholar-to-overshadow-them-all-comparing-the-sizes-of-12-academic-search/)
- [An evidence-based practice guideline for the peer review of electronic search strategies](https://scholariq.org/papers/an-evidence-based-practice-guideline-for-the-peer-review-of-electronic-search/)
- [Improving the translation of search strategies using the Polyglot Search Translator: a randomized controlled trial](https://scholariq.org/papers/improving-the-translation-of-search-strategies-using-the-polyglot-search/)
- [Citationchaser: A tool for transparent and efficient forward and backward citation chasing in systematic searching](https://scholariq.org/papers/citationchaser-a-tool-for-transparent-and-efficient-forward-and-backward/)
- [Assessing scientists for hiring, promotion, and tenure](https://scholariq.org/papers/assessing-scientists-for-hiring-promotion-and-tenure/)
- [Online tools supporting the conduct and reporting of systematic reviews and systematic maps: a case study on CADIMA and review of existing tools](https://scholariq.org/papers/online-tools-supporting-the-conduct-and-reporting-of-systematic-reviews-and/)

## Topic primary papers

Showing 15 of 46.

- [The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching](https://scholariq.org/papers/the-role-of-google-scholar-in-evidence-reviews-and-its-applicability-to-grey/)
- [Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank](https://scholariq.org/papers/deep-impact-unintended-consequences-of-journal-rank/)
- [Observing many researchers using the same data and hypothesis reveals a hidden universe of uncertainty](https://scholariq.org/papers/observing-many-researchers-using-the-same-data-and-hypothesis-reveals-a-hidden/)
- [The impact of free access to the scientific literature: a review of recent research](https://scholariq.org/papers/the-impact-of-free-access-to-the-scientific-literature-a-review-of-recent/)
- [Scientometrics and information retrieval: weak-links revitalized](https://scholariq.org/papers/scientometrics-and-information-retrieval-weak-links-revitalized/)
- [Search where you will find most: Comparing the disciplinary coverage of 56 bibliographic databases](https://scholariq.org/papers/search-where-you-will-find-most-comparing-the-disciplinary-coverage-of-56/)
- [The role of domain-specific and domain-general cognitive functions and skills in sports performance: A meta-analysis.](https://scholariq.org/papers/the-role-of-domain-specific-and-domain-general-cognitive-functions-and-skills-in/)
- [Beyond Google Scholar, Scopus, and Web of Science: An evaluation of the backward and forward citation coverage of 59 databases' citation indices](https://scholariq.org/papers/beyond-google-scholar-scopus-and-web-of-science-an-evaluation-of-the-backward/)
- [Reference coverage analysis of OpenAlex compared to Web of Science and Scopus](https://scholariq.org/papers/reference-coverage-analysis-of-openalex-compared-to-web-of-science-and-scopus-2/)
- [Citation Classics in Radiology Journals: The 100 Top-Cited Articles, 1945–2012](https://scholariq.org/papers/citation-classics-in-radiology-journals-the-100-top-cited-articles-1945-2012/)
- [Global Cardiovascular Research Output, Citations, and Collaborations: A Time-Trend, Bibliometric Analysis (1999–2008)](https://scholariq.org/papers/global-cardiovascular-research-output-citations-and-collaborations-a-time-trend/)
- [Assessing the effects of the German Excellence Initiative with bibliometric methods](https://scholariq.org/papers/assessing-the-effects-of-the-german-excellence-initiative-with-bibliometric/)
- [A relational altmetric? Network centrality on <scp>R</scp>esearch<scp>G</scp>ate as an indicator of scientific impact](https://scholariq.org/papers/a-relational-altmetric-network-centrality-on-scp-r-scp-esearch-scp-g-scp-ate-as/)
- [A study of institutional spending on open access publication fees in Germany](https://scholariq.org/papers/a-study-of-institutional-spending-on-open-access-publication-fees-in-germany/)
- [Open is not forever: A study of vanished open access journals](https://scholariq.org/papers/open-is-not-forever-a-study-of-vanished-open-access-journals/)

---
Source: ScholarIQ — public research metadata, principally OpenAlex. See https://scholariq.org/sources/ for provenance and https://scholariq.org/methodology/ for what these figures mean.