Scholar IQ
Try ScholarIQ free
Upload Records Snowball Search Search OpenAlex
About the database
On this page:OverviewKey papers
ScholarIQanswers from OpenAlex

Health Technology Assessment

JournalCitation impact & published research

Health Technology Assessment is a journal indexed in ScholarIQ from OpenAlex. ScholarIQ records 1,960 works, 165,995 citations and an h-index of 199.

1,960
Works
165,995
Citations
199
h-index

What are the most-cited papers on Health Technology Assessment?

ScholarIQmost cited works
Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies
Jonathan J Deeks, Jacqueline Dinnes, Roberto D’Amico, Amanda Sowden, C Sakarovitch, Fengyu Song, Mark Petticrew, Douglas G. Altman
Health Technology Assessment. 20032,932 CitationsOPEN ACCESS
Methods for evaluating area-wide and organisation-based interventions in health and health care: a systematic review.
Ukoumunne, Martin Gulliford, Chinn, Sterne, Peter Burney
Health Technology Assessment. 19991,180 CitationsOPEN ACCESS
Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases
Fujian Song, Susan Parekh, Lee Hooper, YK Loke, Jon J Ryder, Alex J. Sutton, Caroline Hing, Chun Shing Kwok, Chun Pang, I. Harvey
Health Technology Assessment. 20101,043 CitationsOPEN ACCESS
Methods for the estimation of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence cost-effectiveness threshold
Karl Claxton, Steve Martin, Marta Soares, Nigel Rice, Eldon Spackman, Sebastian Hinde, Nancy Devlin, Peter Smith, Mark Sculpher
Health Technology Assessment. 2015862 CitationsOPEN ACCESS

Related on ScholarIQ

Evaluating non-randomised intervention studies
Paper
Methods for evaluating area-wide and organisation-based interventions in health and health care: a systematic review.
Paper
Dissemination and publication of research findings: an updated review of related biases
Paper
Methods for the estimation of the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence cost-effectiveness threshold
Paper
Behaviour change techniques: the development and evaluation of a taxonomic method for reporting and describing behaviour change interventions (a suite of five studies involving consensus methods, randomised controlled trials and analysis of qualitative data)
Paper
Influence of reported study design characteristics on intervention effect estimates from randomised controlled trials: combined analysis of meta-epidemiological studies.
Paper
470M+ articles · free account