ScholarIQanswers from OpenAlex

A randomized double‐blind pilot study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intravenous iron versus oral iron for the treatment of restless legs syndrome in patients with iron deficiency anemia

PaperCitations, authors & open-access status

A randomized double‐blind pilot study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intravenous iron versus oral iron for the treatment of restless legs syndrome in patients with iron deficiency anemia is a paper indexed in ScholarIQ from OpenAlex.

How many citations does A randomized double‐blind pilot study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intravenous iron versus oral iron for the treatment of restless legs syndrome in patients with iron deficiency anemia have?

ScholarIQcitation count

A randomized double‐blind pilot study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intravenous iron versus oral iron for the treatment of restless legs syndrome in patients with iron deficiency anemia has 13 citations in the OpenAlex counts ScholarIQ stores.

When was A randomized double‐blind pilot study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intravenous iron versus oral iron for the treatment of restless legs syndrome in patients with iron deficiency anemia published?

ScholarIQyear

A randomized double‐blind pilot study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intravenous iron versus oral iron for the treatment of restless legs syndrome in patients with iron deficiency anemia has 2024 year in the ScholarIQ index.

What is the open-access status of A randomized double‐blind pilot study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intravenous iron versus oral iron for the treatment of restless legs syndrome in patients with iron deficiency anemia?

ScholarIQoa status

A randomized double‐blind pilot study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intravenous iron versus oral iron for the treatment of restless legs syndrome in patients with iron deficiency anemia has bronze oa status in the ScholarIQ index.

What is the DOI of A randomized double‐blind pilot study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intravenous iron versus oral iron for the treatment of restless legs syndrome in patients with iron deficiency anemia?

ScholarIQdoi

The DOI for A randomized double‐blind pilot study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intravenous iron versus oral iron for the treatment of restless legs syndrome in patients with iron deficiency anemia is on the source record.

What is the PMID of A randomized double‐blind pilot study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intravenous iron versus oral iron for the treatment of restless legs syndrome in patients with iron deficiency anemia?

ScholarIQpmid

The PMID for A randomized double‐blind pilot study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intravenous iron versus oral iron for the treatment of restless legs syndrome in patients with iron deficiency anemia is on the source record.

What is the OpenAlex record for A randomized double‐blind pilot study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intravenous iron versus oral iron for the treatment of restless legs syndrome in patients with iron deficiency anemia?

ScholarIQopenalex

The OpenAlex for A randomized double‐blind pilot study to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of intravenous iron versus oral iron for the treatment of restless legs syndrome in patients with iron deficiency anemia is on the source record.

Related on ScholarIQ

470M+ articles · 14-day free trial