Accuracy of three‐dimensional ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies using <scp>ESHRE–ESGE</scp> consensus on the classification of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract
Accuracy of three‐dimensional ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies using <scp>ESHRE–ESGE</scp> consensus on the classification of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract is a paper indexed in ScholarIQ from OpenAlex.
How many citations does Accuracy of three‐dimensional ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies using <scp>ESHRE–ESGE</scp> consensus on the classification of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract have?
Accuracy of three‐dimensional ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies using <scp>ESHRE–ESGE</scp> consensus on the classification of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract has 110 citations in the OpenAlex counts ScholarIQ stores.
When was Accuracy of three‐dimensional ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies using <scp>ESHRE–ESGE</scp> consensus on the classification of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract published?
Accuracy of three‐dimensional ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies using <scp>ESHRE–ESGE</scp> consensus on the classification of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract has 2015 year in the ScholarIQ index.
What is the open-access status of Accuracy of three‐dimensional ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies using <scp>ESHRE–ESGE</scp> consensus on the classification of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract?
Accuracy of three‐dimensional ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies using <scp>ESHRE–ESGE</scp> consensus on the classification of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract has bronze oa status in the ScholarIQ index.
What is the DOI of Accuracy of three‐dimensional ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies using <scp>ESHRE–ESGE</scp> consensus on the classification of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract?
The DOI for Accuracy of three‐dimensional ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies using <scp>ESHRE–ESGE</scp> consensus on the classification of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract is on the source record.
What is the PMID of Accuracy of three‐dimensional ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies using <scp>ESHRE–ESGE</scp> consensus on the classification of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract?
The PMID for Accuracy of three‐dimensional ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies using <scp>ESHRE–ESGE</scp> consensus on the classification of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract is on the source record.
What is the OpenAlex record for Accuracy of three‐dimensional ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies using <scp>ESHRE–ESGE</scp> consensus on the classification of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract?
The OpenAlex for Accuracy of three‐dimensional ultrasound compared with magnetic resonance imaging in diagnosis of Müllerian duct anomalies using <scp>ESHRE–ESGE</scp> consensus on the classification of congenital anomalies of the female genital tract is on the source record.