Approximate is Better than “Exact” for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions
Approximate is Better than “Exact” for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions is a paper indexed in ScholarIQ from OpenAlex.
How many citations does Approximate is Better than “Exact” for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions have?
Approximate is Better than “Exact” for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions has 3,241 citations in the OpenAlex counts ScholarIQ stores.
When was Approximate is Better than “Exact” for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions published?
Approximate is Better than “Exact” for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions has 1998 year in the ScholarIQ index.
What is the open-access status of Approximate is Better than “Exact” for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions?
Approximate is Better than “Exact” for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions has closed oa status in the ScholarIQ index.
What is the DOI of Approximate is Better than “Exact” for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions?
The DOI for Approximate is Better than “Exact” for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions is on the source record.
What is the OpenAlex record for Approximate is Better than “Exact” for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions?
The OpenAlex for Approximate is Better than “Exact” for Interval Estimation of Binomial Proportions is on the source record.