ScholarIQanswers from OpenAlex

Commentary: Sensitivity of Fite-faraco Versus Auramine-rhodamine in Mycobacterial Infection

PaperCitations, authors & open-access status

Commentary: Sensitivity of Fite-faraco Versus Auramine-rhodamine in Mycobacterial Infection is a paper indexed in ScholarIQ from OpenAlex.

How many citations does Commentary: Sensitivity of Fite-faraco Versus Auramine-rhodamine in Mycobacterial Infection have?

ScholarIQcitation count

Commentary: Sensitivity of Fite-faraco Versus Auramine-rhodamine in Mycobacterial Infection has 2 citations in the OpenAlex counts ScholarIQ stores.

When was Commentary: Sensitivity of Fite-faraco Versus Auramine-rhodamine in Mycobacterial Infection published?

ScholarIQyear

Commentary: Sensitivity of Fite-faraco Versus Auramine-rhodamine in Mycobacterial Infection has 2021 year in the ScholarIQ index.

What is the open-access status of Commentary: Sensitivity of Fite-faraco Versus Auramine-rhodamine in Mycobacterial Infection?

ScholarIQoa status

Commentary: Sensitivity of Fite-faraco Versus Auramine-rhodamine in Mycobacterial Infection has hybrid oa status in the ScholarIQ index.

What is the DOI of Commentary: Sensitivity of Fite-faraco Versus Auramine-rhodamine in Mycobacterial Infection?

ScholarIQdoi

The DOI for Commentary: Sensitivity of Fite-faraco Versus Auramine-rhodamine in Mycobacterial Infection is on the source record.

What is the OpenAlex record for Commentary: Sensitivity of Fite-faraco Versus Auramine-rhodamine in Mycobacterial Infection?

ScholarIQopenalex

The OpenAlex for Commentary: Sensitivity of Fite-faraco Versus Auramine-rhodamine in Mycobacterial Infection is on the source record.

Related on ScholarIQ

470M+ articles · 14-day free trial