Do highly physically active workers die early? A systematic review with meta-analysis of data from 193 696 participants
Do highly physically active workers die early? A systematic review with meta-analysis of data from 193 696 participants is a paper indexed in ScholarIQ from OpenAlex.
How many citations does Do highly physically active workers die early? A systematic review with meta-analysis of data from 193 696 participants have?
Do highly physically active workers die early? A systematic review with meta-analysis of data from 193 696 participants has 370 citations in the OpenAlex counts ScholarIQ stores.
When was Do highly physically active workers die early? A systematic review with meta-analysis of data from 193 696 participants published?
Do highly physically active workers die early? A systematic review with meta-analysis of data from 193 696 participants has 2018 year in the ScholarIQ index.
What is the open-access status of Do highly physically active workers die early? A systematic review with meta-analysis of data from 193 696 participants?
Do highly physically active workers die early? A systematic review with meta-analysis of data from 193 696 participants has green oa status in the ScholarIQ index.
What is the DOI of Do highly physically active workers die early? A systematic review with meta-analysis of data from 193 696 participants?
The DOI for Do highly physically active workers die early? A systematic review with meta-analysis of data from 193 696 participants is on the source record.
What is the PMID of Do highly physically active workers die early? A systematic review with meta-analysis of data from 193 696 participants?
The PMID for Do highly physically active workers die early? A systematic review with meta-analysis of data from 193 696 participants is on the source record.
What is the OpenAlex record for Do highly physically active workers die early? A systematic review with meta-analysis of data from 193 696 participants?
The OpenAlex for Do highly physically active workers die early? A systematic review with meta-analysis of data from 193 696 participants is on the source record.