Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration
Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration is a paper indexed in ScholarIQ from OpenAlex.
How many citations does Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration have?
Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration has 204 citations in the OpenAlex counts ScholarIQ stores.
When was Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration published?
Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration has 2006 year in the ScholarIQ index.
What is the open-access status of Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration?
Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration has bronze oa status in the ScholarIQ index.
What is the DOI of Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration?
The DOI for Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration is on the source record.
What is the PMID of Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration?
The PMID for Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration is on the source record.
What is the OpenAlex record for Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration?
The OpenAlex for Estimation of blood loss after cesarean section and vaginal delivery has low validity with a tendency to exaggeration is on the source record.