Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials

Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials is a paper indexed in ScholarIQ from OpenAlex.

How many citations does Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials have?

Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials has 106 citations in the OpenAlex counts ScholarIQ stores.

When was Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials published?

Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials has 2016 year in the ScholarIQ index.

What is the open-access status of Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials?

Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials has bronze oa status in the ScholarIQ index.

What is the DOI of Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials?

The DOI for Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials is on the source record.

What is the PMID of Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials?

The PMID for Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials is on the source record.

What is the OpenAlex record for Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials?

The OpenAlex for Laparoscopic versus open repair for perforated peptic ulcer: A meta analysis of randomized controlled trials is on the source record.