Laser ablation is more effective for spongiform than solid thyroid nodules. A 4-year retrospective follow-up study
Laser ablation is more effective for spongiform than solid thyroid nodules. A 4-year retrospective follow-up study is a paper indexed in ScholarIQ from OpenAlex.
How many citations does Laser ablation is more effective for spongiform than solid thyroid nodules. A 4-year retrospective follow-up study have?
Laser ablation is more effective for spongiform than solid thyroid nodules. A 4-year retrospective follow-up study has 51 citations in the OpenAlex counts ScholarIQ stores.
When was Laser ablation is more effective for spongiform than solid thyroid nodules. A 4-year retrospective follow-up study published?
Laser ablation is more effective for spongiform than solid thyroid nodules. A 4-year retrospective follow-up study has 2016 year in the ScholarIQ index.
What is the open-access status of Laser ablation is more effective for spongiform than solid thyroid nodules. A 4-year retrospective follow-up study?
Laser ablation is more effective for spongiform than solid thyroid nodules. A 4-year retrospective follow-up study has bronze oa status in the ScholarIQ index.
What is the DOI of Laser ablation is more effective for spongiform than solid thyroid nodules. A 4-year retrospective follow-up study?
The DOI for Laser ablation is more effective for spongiform than solid thyroid nodules. A 4-year retrospective follow-up study is on the source record.
What is the PMID of Laser ablation is more effective for spongiform than solid thyroid nodules. A 4-year retrospective follow-up study?
The PMID for Laser ablation is more effective for spongiform than solid thyroid nodules. A 4-year retrospective follow-up study is on the source record.
What is the OpenAlex record for Laser ablation is more effective for spongiform than solid thyroid nodules. A 4-year retrospective follow-up study?
The OpenAlex for Laser ablation is more effective for spongiform than solid thyroid nodules. A 4-year retrospective follow-up study is on the source record.