Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up

Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up is a paper indexed in ScholarIQ from OpenAlex.

How many citations does Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up have?

Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up has 146 citations in the OpenAlex counts ScholarIQ stores.

When was Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up published?

Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up has 2021 year in the ScholarIQ index.

What is the open-access status of Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up?

Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up has hybrid oa status in the ScholarIQ index.

What is the DOI of Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up?

The DOI for Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up is on the source record.

What is the PMID of Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up?

The PMID for Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up is on the source record.

What is the OpenAlex record for Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up?

The OpenAlex for Leadless vs. transvenous single-chamber ventricular pacing in the Micra CED study: 2-year follow-up is on the source record.