Robot-Assisted vs . Conventional Laparoscopic Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A Comparative Study on Costs and Time
Robot-Assisted vs . Conventional Laparoscopic Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A Comparative Study on Costs and Time is a paper indexed in ScholarIQ from OpenAlex.
How many citations does Robot-Assisted vs . Conventional Laparoscopic Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A Comparative Study on Costs and Time have?
Robot-Assisted vs . Conventional Laparoscopic Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A Comparative Study on Costs and Time has 145 citations in the OpenAlex counts ScholarIQ stores.
When was Robot-Assisted vs . Conventional Laparoscopic Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A Comparative Study on Costs and Time published?
Robot-Assisted vs . Conventional Laparoscopic Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A Comparative Study on Costs and Time has 2007 year in the ScholarIQ index.
What is the open-access status of Robot-Assisted vs . Conventional Laparoscopic Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A Comparative Study on Costs and Time?
Robot-Assisted vs . Conventional Laparoscopic Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A Comparative Study on Costs and Time has green oa status in the ScholarIQ index.
What is the DOI of Robot-Assisted vs . Conventional Laparoscopic Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A Comparative Study on Costs and Time?
The DOI for Robot-Assisted vs . Conventional Laparoscopic Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A Comparative Study on Costs and Time is on the source record.
What is the PMID of Robot-Assisted vs . Conventional Laparoscopic Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A Comparative Study on Costs and Time?
The PMID for Robot-Assisted vs . Conventional Laparoscopic Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A Comparative Study on Costs and Time is on the source record.
What is the OpenAlex record for Robot-Assisted vs . Conventional Laparoscopic Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A Comparative Study on Costs and Time?
The OpenAlex for Robot-Assisted vs . Conventional Laparoscopic Rectopexy for Rectal Prolapse: A Comparative Study on Costs and Time is on the source record.