ScholarIQanswers from OpenAlex

Systematic review draws limited conclusions regarding the effectiveness of reading comprehension interventions for people with aphasia but offers guidance for future research and practicing clinicians<sup>1</sup>

PaperCitations, authors & open-access status

Systematic review draws limited conclusions regarding the effectiveness of reading comprehension interventions for people with aphasia but offers guidance for future research and practicing clinicians<sup>1</sup> is a paper indexed in ScholarIQ from OpenAlex.

How many citations does Systematic review draws limited conclusions regarding the effectiveness of reading comprehension interventions for people with aphasia but offers guidance for future research and practicing clinicians<sup>1</sup> have?

ScholarIQcitation count

Systematic review draws limited conclusions regarding the effectiveness of reading comprehension interventions for people with aphasia but offers guidance for future research and practicing clinicians<sup>1</sup> has 1 citations in the OpenAlex counts ScholarIQ stores.

When was Systematic review draws limited conclusions regarding the effectiveness of reading comprehension interventions for people with aphasia but offers guidance for future research and practicing clinicians<sup>1</sup> published?

ScholarIQyear

Systematic review draws limited conclusions regarding the effectiveness of reading comprehension interventions for people with aphasia but offers guidance for future research and practicing clinicians<sup>1</sup> has 2021 year in the ScholarIQ index.

What is the open-access status of Systematic review draws limited conclusions regarding the effectiveness of reading comprehension interventions for people with aphasia but offers guidance for future research and practicing clinicians<sup>1</sup>?

ScholarIQoa status

Systematic review draws limited conclusions regarding the effectiveness of reading comprehension interventions for people with aphasia but offers guidance for future research and practicing clinicians<sup>1</sup> has closed oa status in the ScholarIQ index.

What is the DOI of Systematic review draws limited conclusions regarding the effectiveness of reading comprehension interventions for people with aphasia but offers guidance for future research and practicing clinicians<sup>1</sup>?

ScholarIQdoi

The DOI for Systematic review draws limited conclusions regarding the effectiveness of reading comprehension interventions for people with aphasia but offers guidance for future research and practicing clinicians<sup>1</sup> is on the source record.

What is the OpenAlex record for Systematic review draws limited conclusions regarding the effectiveness of reading comprehension interventions for people with aphasia but offers guidance for future research and practicing clinicians<sup>1</sup>?

ScholarIQopenalex

The OpenAlex for Systematic review draws limited conclusions regarding the effectiveness of reading comprehension interventions for people with aphasia but offers guidance for future research and practicing clinicians<sup>1</sup> is on the source record.

Related on ScholarIQ

470M+ articles · 14-day free trial