ScholarIQanswers from OpenAlex

Thoracoscopic vs open resection of congenital lung lesions: a meta-analysis

PaperCitations, authors & open-access status

Thoracoscopic vs open resection of congenital lung lesions: a meta-analysis is a paper indexed in ScholarIQ from OpenAlex.

How many citations does Thoracoscopic vs open resection of congenital lung lesions: a meta-analysis have?

ScholarIQcitation count

Thoracoscopic vs open resection of congenital lung lesions: a meta-analysis has 99 citations in the OpenAlex counts ScholarIQ stores.

When was Thoracoscopic vs open resection of congenital lung lesions: a meta-analysis published?

ScholarIQyear

Thoracoscopic vs open resection of congenital lung lesions: a meta-analysis has 2012 year in the ScholarIQ index.

What is the open-access status of Thoracoscopic vs open resection of congenital lung lesions: a meta-analysis?

ScholarIQoa status

Thoracoscopic vs open resection of congenital lung lesions: a meta-analysis has closed oa status in the ScholarIQ index.

What is the DOI of Thoracoscopic vs open resection of congenital lung lesions: a meta-analysis?

ScholarIQdoi

The DOI for Thoracoscopic vs open resection of congenital lung lesions: a meta-analysis is on the source record.

What is the PMID of Thoracoscopic vs open resection of congenital lung lesions: a meta-analysis?

ScholarIQpmid

The PMID for Thoracoscopic vs open resection of congenital lung lesions: a meta-analysis is on the source record.

What is the OpenAlex record for Thoracoscopic vs open resection of congenital lung lesions: a meta-analysis?

ScholarIQopenalex

The OpenAlex for Thoracoscopic vs open resection of congenital lung lesions: a meta-analysis is on the source record.

Related on ScholarIQ

470M+ articles · 14-day free trial