On this page:OverviewPublicationsResearchersKey papersJournalsOpen accessInstitutions
ScholarIQanswers from OpenAlex

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews

TopicLeading institutions, researchers & key papers

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews is a topic indexed in ScholarIQ from OpenAlex.

What is known about Meta-analysis and systematic reviews?

ScholarIQrecord summary

This cluster of papers focuses on methods and guidelines for conducting systematic reviews, meta-analyses, and evidence synthesis in research. It covers topics such as the PRISMA statement, measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses, assessing risk of bias, detecting publication bias, and interpreting effect sizes. The papers also discuss reporting guidelines, quality assessment tools, and diagnostic accuracy in research.

How many works does Meta-analysis and systematic reviews have?

ScholarIQindexed works

Meta-analysis and systematic reviews has 515 works in the ScholarIQ index. The count is the OpenAlex total, not the number of papers listed on this page.

What is the OpenAlex record for Meta-analysis and systematic reviews?

ScholarIQopenalex

The OpenAlex for Meta-analysis and systematic reviews is on the source record.

What are the most-cited papers on Meta-analysis and systematic reviews?

ScholarIQmost cited works
The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews
Matthew J. Page, Joanne E. McKenzie, Patrick M. Bossuyt, Isabelle Boutron, Tammy Hoffmann, Cynthia D. Mulrow, Larissa Shamseer, Jennifer Tetzlaff, Elie A. Akl, Sue Brennan, Roger Chou, Julie Glanville, Jeremy Grimshaw, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Manoj M. Lalu, Tianjing Li, Elizabeth Loder, Evan Mayo‐Wilson, Steve McDonald, Luke A. McGuinness, Lesley Stewart, James Thomas, Andrea C. Tricco, Vivian Welch, Penny Whiting, David Moher
BMJ. 2021100,010 CitationsOPEN ACCESS
Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses
Julian P. T. Higgins, Simon G. Thompson, Jonathan J Deeks, Douglas G. Altman
BMJ. 200363,469 CitationsOPEN ACCESS
Consolidated criteria for reporting qualitative research (COREQ): a 32-item checklist for interviews and focus groups
Allison Tong, Peter Sainsbury, Jonathan C. Craig
International Journal for Quality in Health Care. 200742,723 CitationsOPEN ACCESS
The Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Julian P. T. Higgins, Doug Altman, Peter C Gøtzsche, Peter Jüni, David Moher, Andrew D Oxman, Jelena Savović, Kenneth F. Schulz, Laura Weeks, Jonathan A C Sterne, Cochrane Bias Methods Group, Cochrane Statistical Methods Group
BMJ. 201134,575 CitationsOPEN ACCESS
RoB 2: a revised tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials
Jonathan A C Sterne, Jelena Savović, Matthew J. Page, Roy G. Elbers, Natalie Blencowe, Isabelle Boutron, Christopher J Cates, Hung‐Yuan Cheng, Mark Corbett, Sandra Eldridge, Jonathan Emberson, Miguel A. Hernán, Sally Hopewell, Asbjørn Hróbjartsson, Daniela R. Junqueira, Peter Jüni, Jamie J Kirkham, Toby J Lasserson, Tianjing Li, Alexandra McAleenan, Barnaby C Reeves, Sasha Shepperd, Ian Shrier, Lesley Stewart, Kate Tilling, Ian R. White, Penny Whiting, Julian P. T. Higgins
BMJ. 201931,918 CitationsOPEN ACCESS

Where is Meta-analysis and systematic reviews research published, and who funds it?

ScholarIQvenues & funding sources

TOP FUNDERS

National Science Foundation—
NIH—
Wellcome Trust—
European Research Council—
Funder breakdown is a member featureSign up free to unlock

How much of the research on Meta-analysis and systematic reviews is open access?

ScholarIQopen access share
93%OPEN ACCESS
Gold
27%
Green
7%
Hybrid
33%
Bronze
27%
Closed
7%

Related on ScholarIQ

470M+ articles · 14-day free trial