Upload Records Snowball Search Search OpenAlex
About the database ScholarIQanswers from OpenAlex
scientometrics and bibliometrics research
TopicLeading institutions, researchers & key papers
This cluster of papers focuses on bibliometric analysis, research evaluation, and the assessment of scientific impact. It covers topics such as citation networks, collaboration patterns, open access publishing, social impact assessment, altmetrics, co-authorship networks, and interdisciplinary research.
94
Works
IDs:OpenAlex
How has scientometrics and bibliometrics research's publication output changed over time?
ScholarIQpublication output · 2011–2025
Output grew0% over the shown period — from 1 works in 2011 to 1 in 2025.
1
3
1
2
2
2
2
1
1
201120132014201520162021202220242025
What are the most-cited papers on scientometrics and bibliometrics research?
ScholarIQmost cited works
The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching
Neal Haddaway, Alexandra Collins, Deborah Coughlin, Stuart A. Kirk
PLoS ONE. 20152,336 CitationsOPEN ACCESS
Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank
Björn Brembs, Katherine S. Button, Marcus R. Munafò
Frontiers in Human Neuroscience. 2013457 CitationsOPEN ACCESS
Observing many researchers using the same data and hypothesis reveals a hidden universe of uncertainty
Nate Breznau, Eike Mark Rinke, Alexander Wuttke, Hung Hoang Viet Nguyen, Muna Adem, Jule Adriaans, Amalia Álvarez-Benjumea, Henrik Kenneth Andersen, Daniel Auer, Flávio Azevedo, Oke Bahnsen, Dave Balzer, Gerrit Bauer, Paul Cornelius Bauer, Markus Baumann, Sharon Baute, Verena Benoit, Julian Bernauer, Carl Berning, Anna Berthold, Felix S. Bethke, Thomas Biegert, Katharina Blinzler, Johannes N. Blumenberg, Licia Bobzien, Andrea Bohman, Thijs Bol, Amie Bostic, Zuzanna Brzozowska, Katharina Burgdorf, Klaus Burger, Kathrin Busch, Juan Carlos Castillo, Nathan Chan, Pablo Christmann, Roxanne Connelly, Christian S. Czymara, Elena Damian, Alejandro Ecker, Achim Edelmann, Maureen A. Eger, Simon Ellerbrock, Anna Forke, Andrea Förster, Chris Gaasendam, Konstantin Gavras, Vernon Gayle, Theresa Gessler, Timo Gnambs, Amélie Godefroidt, Max Grömping, Martin Groß, Stefan Gruber, Tobias Gummer, Andreas Hadjar, Jan Paul Heisig, Sebastian Hellmeier, Stefanie Heyne, Magdalena Hirsch, Mikael Hjerm, Oshrat Hochman, Andreas Hövermann, Sophia Hunger, Christian Hunkler, Nora Huth-Stöckle, Zsófia S. Ignácz, Laura Jacobs, Jannes Jacobsen, Bastian Jaeger, Sebastian Jungkunz, Nils Jungmann, Mathias Kauff, Manuel Kleinert, Julia Klinger, Jan-Philipp Kolb, Marta Kołczyńska, John Kuk, Katharina Kunißen, Dafina Kurti Sinatra, Alexander Langenkamp, Philipp M. Lersch, Lea-Maria Löbel, Philipp Lutscher, Matthias Mader, Joan E. Madia, Natalia Malancu, Luis Maldonado, Helge Marahrens, Nicole Martin, Paul Martinez, Jochen Mayerl, Oscar J. Mayorga, Patricia McManus, Kyle McWagner, Cecil Meeusen, Daniel Meierrieks, Jonathan Mellon, Friedolin Merhout, Samuel Merk, Daniel Meyer
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2022222 CitationsOPEN ACCESS
The impact of free access to the scientific literature: a review of recent research
Philip M. Davis, William H. Walters
S146304353. 2011210 CitationsOPEN ACCESS
Scientometrics and information retrieval: weak-links revitalized
Philipp Mayr, Andrea Scharnhorst
Scientometrics. 2014192 CitationsOPEN ACCESS
Where is scientometrics and bibliometrics research research published, and who funds it?
ScholarIQvenues & funding sources
TOP JOURNALS
PLoS ONE2,433
S146304353210
TOP FUNDERS
National Science Foundation—
NIH—
Wellcome Trust—
European Research Council—
Funder breakdown is a member featureSign up free to unlock
How much of the research on scientometrics and bibliometrics research is open access?
ScholarIQopen access share
80%OPEN ACCESS
Gold
33%
Green
7%
Hybrid
33%
Bronze
7%
Closed
20%
Related on ScholarIQ
A manifesto for reproducible science
Paper
The Role of Google Scholar in Evidence Reviews and Its Applicability to Grey Literature Searching
Paper
Systematic Reviews: Identifying relevant studies for systematic reviews
Paper
Which academic search systems are suitable for systematic reviews or meta‐analyses? Evaluating retrieval qualities of Google Scholar, PubMed, and 26 other resources
Paper
Optimal database combinations for literature searches in systematic reviews: a prospective exploratory study
Paper
Systematic review finds overlapping reviews were not mentioned in every other overview
Paper