Intestinal failure type III. Are GLIM criteria better than subjective global assessment to diagnose nutritional status?

Intestinal failure type III. Are GLIM criteria better than subjective global assessment to diagnose nutritional status? is a paper indexed in ScholarIQ from OpenAlex.

How many citations does Intestinal failure type III. Are GLIM criteria better than subjective global assessment to diagnose nutritional status? have?

Intestinal failure type III. Are GLIM criteria better than subjective global assessment to diagnose nutritional status? has 1 citations in the OpenAlex counts ScholarIQ stores.

When was Intestinal failure type III. Are GLIM criteria better than subjective global assessment to diagnose nutritional status? published?

Intestinal failure type III. Are GLIM criteria better than subjective global assessment to diagnose nutritional status? has 2020 year in the ScholarIQ index.

What is the open-access status of Intestinal failure type III. Are GLIM criteria better than subjective global assessment to diagnose nutritional status??

Intestinal failure type III. Are GLIM criteria better than subjective global assessment to diagnose nutritional status? has closed oa status in the ScholarIQ index.

What is the DOI of Intestinal failure type III. Are GLIM criteria better than subjective global assessment to diagnose nutritional status??

The DOI for Intestinal failure type III. Are GLIM criteria better than subjective global assessment to diagnose nutritional status? is on the source record.

What is the OpenAlex record for Intestinal failure type III. Are GLIM criteria better than subjective global assessment to diagnose nutritional status??

The OpenAlex for Intestinal failure type III. Are GLIM criteria better than subjective global assessment to diagnose nutritional status? is on the source record.