ScholarIQanswers from OpenAlex

Transtibial Prosthetic Socket Strength: The Use of ISO 10328 in the Comparison of Standard and 3D-Printed Sockets

PaperCitations, authors & open-access status

Transtibial Prosthetic Socket Strength: The Use of ISO 10328 in the Comparison of Standard and 3D-Printed Sockets is a paper indexed in ScholarIQ from OpenAlex.

How many citations does Transtibial Prosthetic Socket Strength: The Use of ISO 10328 in the Comparison of Standard and 3D-Printed Sockets have?

ScholarIQcitation count

Transtibial Prosthetic Socket Strength: The Use of ISO 10328 in the Comparison of Standard and 3D-Printed Sockets has 39 citations in the OpenAlex counts ScholarIQ stores.

When was Transtibial Prosthetic Socket Strength: The Use of ISO 10328 in the Comparison of Standard and 3D-Printed Sockets published?

ScholarIQyear

Transtibial Prosthetic Socket Strength: The Use of ISO 10328 in the Comparison of Standard and 3D-Printed Sockets has 2020 year in the ScholarIQ index.

What is the open-access status of Transtibial Prosthetic Socket Strength: The Use of ISO 10328 in the Comparison of Standard and 3D-Printed Sockets?

ScholarIQoa status

Transtibial Prosthetic Socket Strength: The Use of ISO 10328 in the Comparison of Standard and 3D-Printed Sockets has closed oa status in the ScholarIQ index.

What is the DOI of Transtibial Prosthetic Socket Strength: The Use of ISO 10328 in the Comparison of Standard and 3D-Printed Sockets?

ScholarIQdoi

The DOI for Transtibial Prosthetic Socket Strength: The Use of ISO 10328 in the Comparison of Standard and 3D-Printed Sockets is on the source record.

What is the OpenAlex record for Transtibial Prosthetic Socket Strength: The Use of ISO 10328 in the Comparison of Standard and 3D-Printed Sockets?

ScholarIQopenalex

The OpenAlex for Transtibial Prosthetic Socket Strength: The Use of ISO 10328 in the Comparison of Standard and 3D-Printed Sockets is on the source record.

Related on ScholarIQ

470M+ articles · 14-day free trial